Obviously there are many important factors to consider in
appraisal, but I want to focus on the importance of provenance and
identification. One of the first collections I helped process was a photograph
collection, and it was one of the most challenging projects I have undertaken
due to limited provenance and identifying information. This collection
contained hundreds of photographs of various shapes, sizes, and colors, and coming
from different photographers and time periods. The only common bond was
geography: they were all local photographs. After a good deal of research and
recruiting the help of as many volunteers as possible, we finally identified
most of the photographs, although a fair number of the photographs still have unidentified
subjects, photographers, and/or dates.
Although these photographs are all in good condition and
relevant to the institution’s collection, in their present state they are not as
useful as they could be. Without knowing where each of the photographs came
from, the context in which they were created, or what they represent, it will
be hard for researchers to use them effectively. After reading in P:ACM about
the different values of photographs, I realize that the lack of information
relating to provenance seriously undermines much of the potential value of the
photographs. A box full of miscellaneous photographs with unknown subject
matter is of limited use, even if the photographs are old, in good condition,
and relevant to the institution’s mission.
I can understand why these photographs were accepted by the institution,
as they are undeniably within the scope of their collections policy. The institution’s
mission is to collect town history, and the photographs have the potential to
be important sources of knowledge about buildings, people, and places in our
town. Unfortunately, these photographs had to each be identified in order for
them to be truly useful, and we spent too much time on this process. This
experience reinforces for me the importance of accepting photographs that have
as much documentation as possible, because this will both increase the value of
the photograph and increase access to the collection.
Very interesting - was there someone there who had more information about why the collection was accepted? It does seem a tough call.
ReplyDelete